跳至主要内容

New research may shed light on the cause of Mercury's iron core

 Why does Mercury have a large iron core? Now, new research from the University of Maryland suggests that proximity to the sun's magnetic field determines the planet's interior, which may shed light on the mystery of Mercury's iron core.

The study contradicts the common assumption that Mercury has a large core, with a size relative to its mantle (the layer between the planet's core and crust). For decades, scientists have assumed that a "hit-and-run" collision between Mercury and other celestial bodies during the formation of the solar system blew away much of mercury's rocky mantle, leaving behind a huge, dense metal core inside, but new research suggests the sun's magnetic field was not the culprit.

New research suggests that after the formation of the inner planets, the sun's magnetic field gradually drew iron to the center of the solar system, which explains why Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun, has a larger, denser iron core than the outer layers of other rocky planets like Earth and Mars.

William MacDonald, a geology professor at the University of Maryland, and Takashi Yoshizaki of Tohoku University, Japan, built a model showing how the density, mass and iron content of a rocky planet's core are affected by its distance from the sun's magnetic field.

McDonald said: "4 of the solar system's innermost planet, mercury, Venus, earth and Mars, is composed of different ratio of metal and rock, along with more and more distant from the planet from the sun, the metal content of the core will decline, this is a change of gradient, by showing the early solar system formation phase distribution of the raw materials are controlled by the sun's magnetic field, Our paper explains how this process happens."

McDonald developed a model of the composition of the Earth, which is commonly used by planetary scientists to determine the composition of exoplanets. His latest model shows that during the early formation of the solar system, the young sun was surrounded by swirling clouds of dust and gas, and iron particles were drawn to the central region of the solar system by the sun's magnetic field. When solar planets are born from swirling clouds of dust and gas, the cores of planets closer to the Sun absorb more iron than those farther away.

Researchers have found that the density and ratio of iron in a rocky planet's core is related to the strength of the magnetic field around the Sun during the planet's formation, and their latest study suggests that magnetic fields should be taken into account in future attempts to describe the composition of rocky planets, including extrasolar planets.

The composition of a planet's core is important for the possibility of supporting life, for example: Earth's molten iron creates a magnetosphere that protects the planet from cancer-causing cosmic rays. The core contains most of The planet's phosphorus, an important nutrient that supports carbon-based life.

Using existing models of planet formation, McDonald determined the rate at which gas and dust were sucked into the center of the solar system during its formation, taking into account the magnetic field created when the Sun formed and figuring out how the magnetic field pulled iron through the dust and gas clouds.

When the early solar system began to cool, dust and gas that hadn't been sucked into the center of the solar system began to clard together. Dust gas closer to the sun was exposed to a stronger magnetic field, and thus contained more iron than dust gas farther away. As the dust and gas coalesced and cooled to form spinning planets, gravity pulled iron into their cores.

When MacDonald incorporated the model into planetary formation calculations, it revealed gradients in metal content and density that matched exactly what scientists knew about planets in our solar system. Mercury's metallic core makes up about three-quarters of its mass, the cores of Earth and Venus are only about a third of their mass, and the core of Mars is only about a quarter of its mass.

The new understanding of the role of magnetism in planet formation spells trouble for exoplanet exploration, since scientists have no way to observe the magnetism of stars from earth. Scientists infer the composition of an exoplanet from the spectrum of solar radiation. Different elements in a star emit radiation at different wavelengths, so by measuring those wavelengths, we can tell what the star and its surrounding planets are made of.

"A star is made in this way, so the planets around it must be made in this way," McDonald said. "Each planet in the solar system contains iron to varying degrees, based on the early magnetism of the sun."

The next step in the work is for scientists to find another planetary system similar to our solar system -- one made of rocky planets farther from the star. If the density of these exoplanets drops as they radiate outward from the Sun, as our solar system does, then researchers can confirm the new theory and infer that stellar magnetic fields influence planet formation.


评论

此博客中的热门博文

Moroccan football team: "The most familiar stranger"

   When I was still in college ten years ago, I led a sightseeing group of more than 30 Moroccan students. Before meeting them, my general impression of the Moroccans was that they are from North Africa but closer to the Arab world. They have religious beliefs, are used to worship, and are inextricably linked with France.   When I saw the real person, I realized that the North Africans in front of me were actually a group of children playing with each other and having fun in time. They were about the same age as me at the time. I have all kinds of nicknames and nicknames. During the process of taking them to Badaling, the Summer Palace and Houhai, two classmates and I, together with more than 30 Moroccan students, realized "cultural integration" and "world unity" in the small group to some extent.   During the World Cup in Qatar, I was surprised to find that the little-known Morocco team, which was eliminated in the group stage of the last World Cup, after miraculou

Zeigarnik effect

  As a freelancer, you have to fight procrastination every day. "I've made up my mind many times, but I just can't change it. Is it because I'm slow or slow?". In fact, many procrastinations are irrational. Many obstructions are imagined by myself. So distract, postpone, avoid confrontation. It's cool to procrastinate, and it's cool to procrastinate all the time, so I can't do it. Concentration is also related to physical strength. When the physical strength is exhausted, it is even more difficult to concentrate. You’ll tell yourself: I’m too tired to do this—okay, another perfect procrastination.   In 1927, Bruma Zeigarnik's senior research found that people are more likely to care about unfinished and interrupted work than completed work. This is the Zeigarnik effect. For example, we often don't care much about what we have got, but we will especially cherish what we have worked hard but haven't got. Therefore, the TV series will tell you

How Gates and Jobs compete

   Competition is the norm in the business world. Many people even use war as a metaphor for business competition. As master leaders, Apple founder Steve Jobs and Microsoft founder Bill Gates, how do they handle business? What about competition issues? Let's take a look at the four strategies summarized by the author in the book "Strategic Thinking".   The first strategy is the "puppy tactic". The term “puppy tactics” comes from Jean Tirole, the 2014 Nobel Prize winner in economics, and Zhu Fudenberg, a master of economics. It means to make yourself as harmless as possible, to keep competitors completely unaware of your intentions, and even to make the market unclear about your true intentions through camouflage and misleading.   Being undervalued by the market and competitors will give you an edge when entering a new field.   Jobs was a tough entrepreneur. However, he is also a master at employing puppy tactics. For example, Jobs adopted this strategy when he w